Mahajan C, Cormier D, 2015, 3D Printing of Carbon Fiber Composites with Preferentially Aligend Fibers. Shahrubudin N, Lee TC, Ramlan R, 2019, An Overview on 3D Printing Technology: Technological, Materials, and Applications. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International. ĪSTM F2792-12a, 2012, Standard Terminology for Additive Manufacturing Technologies. Hutmacher DW, 2001, Scaffold Design and Fabrication Technologies for Engineering Tissues State of the Art and Future Perspectives. Woodfield T, Malda J, Wijn JD, et al., 2004, Design of Porous Scaffolds for Cartilage Tissue Engineering Using a Threedimensional Fiber-deposition Technique. Ma Y, Dai H, Huang X, et al., 2019, 3D Printing of Bioglass reinforced β-TCP Porous Bioceramic Scaffolds. Jain RK, Au P, Tam J, et al., 2005, Engineering Vascularized Tissue. īramfeldt H, Sabra G, Centis V, et al., 2010, Scaffold Vascularization: A Challenge for Three-Dimensional Tissue Engineering. Olszta M, Cheng X, Jee S, et al., 2007, Bone Structure and Formation: A New Perspective. Ĭao H, Kuboyama N, 2010, A Biodegradable Porous Composite Scaffold of PGA/beta-TCP for Bone Tissue Engineering. Rouwkema J, Rivior NC, Van CA, et al., 2008, Vascularization in Tissue Engineering. Yao Y, Qin W, Xing B, et al., 2021, High performance Hydroxyapatite Ceramics and a Triply Periodic Minimum Surface Structure Fabricated by Digital Light Processing 3D printing. Williams DF, 2008, On the Mechanisms of Biocompatibility. Kim JA, Lim J, Naren R, et al., 2016, Effect of the Biodegradation Rate Controlled by Pore Structures in Magnesium Phosphate Ceramic Scaffolds on Bone Tissue Regeneration In Vivo. Īlmubarak S, Nethercott H, Freeberg M, et al., 2016, Tissue Engineering Strategies for Promoting Vascularized Bone Regeneration. Lai Y, Cao H, Wang X, et al., 2018, Porous Composite Scaffold Incorporating Osteogenic Phytomolecule Icariin for Promoting Skeletal Regeneration in Challenging Osteonecrotic Bone in Rabbits. Īrrington ED, Smith WJ, Chambers HG, et al., 1996, Complications of Iliac Crest Bone Graft Harvesting. Autograft or Allograft? Int Orthop, 39:1343–9. įaldini C, Traina F, Perna F, et al., 2015, Surgical Treatment of Aseptic Forearm Nonunion with Plate and Opposite Bone Graft Strut. Lin KF, He S, Song Y, et al., 2016, Low-Temperature Additive Manufacturing of Biomimic Three-Dimensional Hydroxyapatite/Collagen Scaffolds for Bone Regeneration. Schemitsch EH, 2017, Size Matters: Defining Critical in Bone Defect Size! J Orthop Trauma, 31:S20–2. Zhang X, Li Y, Chen YE, et al., 2016, Cell-free 3D Scaffold with Two-stage Delivery of miRNA-26a to Regenerate Critical-sized Bone Defects. Īnnamalai RT, Hong X, Schott NG, et al., 2019, Injectable Osteogenic Microtissues Containing Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Conformally Fill and Repair Critical-Size Defects. Lan L, Fei Y, Shi J, et al., 2017, In Situ Repair of Bone and Cartilage Defects Using 3D Scanning and 3D Printing. Finally, the paper prospects the future material selection, structural design, functional development, and performance optimization of bone repair scaffolds. Besides, the additional functions of the current bone repair scaffold, such as chondrogenesis, angiogenesis, anti-bacteria, and anti-tumor, were also concluded. The eximious performance of the novel scaffolds was discussed from different aspects (material composition, ink configuration, printing parameters, etc.). To better elucidate the characteristics and advantages of different filament structures, this paper retrieves and summarizes the state of the art in the filament structure of the three-dimensional (3D) bioprinted biodegradable bone repair scaffolds, mainly including single-layer structure, double-layer structure, hollow structure, core-shell structure and bionic structures. Studies have shown that the diversity of filament structures of implantable scaffolds is closely related to their overall properties (mechanical properties, degradation properties, and biological properties). Conventional bone repair scaffolds can no longer meet the high standards and requirements of clinical applications in terms of preparation process and service performance.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |